Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Wolves Rumours Member Posts
47Vintage's Profile
47Vintage's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To 47Vintage's Posts
To 47Vintage's last 5 rumours posts
To 47Vintage's last 5 banter posts
To 47Vintage's last 5 rumour replies
To 47Vintage's last 5 banter replies
47Vintage's rumours posts with other poster's replies to 47Vintage's rumours posts
21 Apr 2025 18:24:44
With alledged interest for MGW from Man City does anyone know if we have a sell on clause and if so what percentage?
1.) 21 Apr 2025 19:22:01
Apparently there is a 10% sell on fee on any profit.
2.) 21 Apr 2025 19:37:14
10% I believe
3.) 21 Apr 2025 20:13:30
Thanks
4.) 22 Apr 2025 07:11:44
Plus £7.5 million when Forest qualify for any European Competition
15 Dec 2024 11:27:26
Looks like Gary ONeil has gone according to TalkSport
1.) 15 Dec 2024 11:59:27
He’s gone good riddance let’s hope fosun have learnt they lesson now
2.) 15 Dec 2024 12:25:58
Yeah E+S tweeted it.
15 May 2024 12:33:22
Saying on X that Che Adams in advanced talks to join Wolves on a free.
1.) 15 May 2024 13:20:32
Saw that 47Vintage. What do you think?
Personally I think if he’s free and can score goals we’ll take him!
2.) 15 May 2024 14:24:33
I'm not sure if he'd be the first choice forwrd, but he would add depth and he has exp.
3.) 15 May 2024 14:26:24
Agree. He’s 27 with Premier experience If we can get him on a free it’s a no brainer as they say
4.) 15 May 2024 15:44:46
Good player. I decent target man with Premier League experience.
5.) 15 May 2024 15:44:47
Seriously underrated player, with decent service he'll score goals.
6.) 15 May 2024 15:54:54
On a free he would be a great addition to the squad which needs more depth. Wouldn't be my first choice if money was no object but we need to cut our cloth etc etc.
7.) 15 May 2024 15:56:12
I've championed Che Adams would be a good signing for us for a fairly longtime now.
Was star player for Birmingham and had run down fro work colleagues.
Took a fair while for him to settle in the Premier but came a decent Premier player with quality.
A bargain on free transfer.
8.) 15 May 2024 17:52:01
If its a free it's not a high risk transfer, let's see what happens we certainly need experienced squad players. Sure the guys not a prolific striker but 1 in 5 in 125 games is OK for a backup player on a free.
9.) 16 May 2024 06:58:01
Interesting that clearly Mendes and Wolves looking to finally ship out Shi's "wonder boy".
Several sources saying several Clubs ie AC Milan, Sevilla and Real Betis as well as Bologna are claimed to be interested.
Apparently price tag is €20million.
Good luck with that!
10.) 16 May 2024 07:38:38
same player that give us the finger
11.) 16 May 2024 07:44:32
we need a statement from the owners their ambition for the club if any when was there a lick of paint jeff shi needs to be moved
47Vintage's banter posts with other poster's replies to 47Vintage's banter posts
07 Jun 2025 23:17:32
So Rayan Ait-Nouri moving to Man City for £36.3m. Wonder if Wolves have been clever enough to re-negotiate Tommy Doyle's 50% sell on clause? Probably not.
1.) 07 Jun 2025 23:43:41
Guess we'll find out, but Shi/Fosun did make UTD pay for Cuhna in 3 installments instead of 5 so they must be doing something right.
2.) 08 Jun 2025 00:06:28
I guess that to the one hundred and however many charges City are facing from the Premier League tonight we can add the daylight robbery regarding the transfer of Rayan Ait Nouri.
3.) 08 Jun 2025 06:50:54
Ken if your wit was any sharper you'd cut yourself. ??
4.) 08 Jun 2025 07:46:37
RAN is actually reported to be going for closer to 50m plus add ons 47vin, I say reported to be because the £ and € signs seem to get used in different feeds. However I think the mid 30s figure is indeed too low and Doylers figure of 3m ridiculous unless its including Hutth as part of a deal from Sunderland, which I can't see.
Agree totally Ken, city are basically taking the Pss. Being allowed to mop up whoever they want without curb or punishments. Maybe nunes grealish and the like will be offloaded but I can't see them breaking even by that.
Meanwhile we'll be picking up unknowns and untried prem players and hoping VP can mold a new batch of bargains for the city's and utds of the future.
The economic sense of letting our gems go for so little dosnt make sense to me when you look at the fees other clubs demand and get.
5.) 08 Jun 2025 08:01:36
I agree Ken, absolutely ridiculous, says an initial £31m is being finalised, possibly £36m with add ons. Terrible business if this is all true, was Sky so not sure. How long will they allow Man City to just keep spending, all because they have expensive lawyers I guess. Good deal from City’s point of view, as we all know RAN not the best defensively but certainly worth more than these figures.
26 Apr 2025 20:01:09
Here's a teaser for a Saturday evening.
How many managers has Matt Doherty played under at Wolves and is it a record?
1.) 26 Apr 2025 22:47:35
I'm guessing 10.
MM, Solbakken, Saunders, Jackett, Edwards, Lambert, Zenga, Nuno, GON and Vitor.
2.) 26 Apr 2025 23:22:40
I’m not sure, think we can add Connor but think he may have been out on loan during Solbakkens time. Anyway it’s some record. Thanks Wandering.
07 Apr 2025 16:29:40
Interesting point made on Refwatch this morning. Why wasn't Ipswich keeper sent off and a penalty awarded for handling on the line from a back pass? If that was an outfield player no argument.
1.) 07 Apr 2025 17:14:15
Very fair point Vintage, I never thought of that.
2.) 07 Apr 2025 17:22:19
Because a keeper handling a backpass only results in a indirect free kick, it is deemed not to be a bookable offence.
3.) 07 Apr 2025 17:26:53
It is fair point but also an odd question for Ref watch to ask as it is the letter of the law. Those have pretry much been the rules since the back pass rule was first invented, doesn't make it logical mind ?
4.) 07 Apr 2025 18:01:36
Bully, it does seem strange that something called 'Refaatch' apparently aren't aware of the rules. Also Vintage, if an out field player had handled ghe ball, it would be a penalty and so could be punished by either a yellow or red card.
02 Feb 2025 19:35:15
Can't find any mention of Toti's performance last night playing along side Agbadou for the first time. Thought they looked a tremendous combination and may have made Danso surplus to requirements anyway. Sure it's only one game they've played together but that was Toti's best game since Kilman left. Perhaps Agbadou is all we were missing, let's hope so.
1.) 02 Feb 2025 20:25:44
Don't need Danso, Toti is back! Thought everybody was 8 out of 10, today . We stuff Villa, THEV lose to Plymouth! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha FWAW!
2.) 02 Feb 2025 20:42:50
You could well be right 47Vintage, personally I've always rated Toti but he does need a good co-CH alongside him. We'll need to see them against a better performing side than the Villa to judge.
3.) 02 Feb 2025 21:35:51
Boing boing splatt.
4.) 02 Feb 2025 21:36:36
I agree Vintage, let's forget Danso. Our Defense looked solid against Villa, let's hope this is the last time Danswho is mentioned on these pages.
5.) 02 Feb 2025 22:26:42
I mentioned after the game that although I think Toti is likely to make a mistake, alongside Agbadou, he looked like a man transformed. We all know that Toti likes to venture forward and earlier this season, if he misplaced a pass or was tackled, we'd be in trouble. But with Agbadou now in place to cover we look so much stronger at the back and even better going forward.
6.) 03 Feb 2025 06:43:09
Been waiting for that raging, it always cheers me up seeing your posting.
7.) 03 Feb 2025 07:11:31
Toti is an accident waiting to happen, he's unreliable.wayward passing and gets caught out when moving forward.
He needs more composure and we definitely need another centre back.
8.) 03 Feb 2025 08:37:46
He played well against the vile, made a real difference in defence and along side Agbado he looked quality
9.) 03 Feb 2025 09:15:41
Longmynd. I have also always rated Toti watched him quite a bit when he was out on loan at Grasshoppers and whilst like any player he can make a mistake but he always gives everything. Next to Agbadou we may well have landed on our feet as it were!
10.) 03 Feb 2025 11:44:27
Agbadou is certainly making a big difference. He still has to find his rhythm but his athleticism and reading of the game are genuinely exciting! If he keeps progressing like he has already then he's going to be an absolute steal for the money paid! ?
11.) 03 Feb 2025 15:31:21
Bullysboy. Agree absolutely he just gets better every game so far it's great to see!
14 Nov 2024 18:52:49
Makes me smile, Harry Kane moaning about players withdrawing from the England squad. Surely a bigger concern are the players returning to their clubs with injuries. Yet another disruption to the Prem this weekend, beginning to lose count. All to do with UEFA extending teams over the past few years and introducing a new competition . No wonder players get burnt out! Sorry Harry but less internationals would be the solution.
1.) 15 Nov 2024 02:33:13
3 international breaks and only 11 games in, there is no need for this Nations league.
2.) 15 Nov 2024 08:57:21
Itsnot about football as a game anymore though, is it?.
3.) 15 Nov 2024 13:24:22
As you say RKO and Abbey
4.) 15 Nov 2024 14:21:15
So right Abbey.finance first, entertainment second and football a poor third.
5.) 15 Nov 2024 14:37:53
Agreed. All about money. More games = more TV = more money.
6.) 16 Nov 2024 11:20:00
I take a different view, folks. To my mind, the Nations League is actually a recent tinkering that works because it has by and large done away with all those nonsensical friendlies we had to endure and pitches like for like in terms of ability and teams like Gibraltar and San Marino can find that they can actually win a game. As for England, it would be a good test if only we hadn't been relegated!
7.) 16 Nov 2024 13:19:48
I agree Old wulf, although clearly it was a test that England failed miserably hence getting relegated.
8.) 16 Nov 2024 13:22:40
Van nisteroy is applying for the Coventry job to be honest I’d like him to have a crack at the wolves job
9.) 16 Nov 2024 23:18:23
Totally disagree Old Wolf. An unnecessary and meaningless competition that heightens the risk of players injuries and severely disrupts the season. As pointed out the 3rd international break in 11 games and players already complaining of burn out?
10.) 16 Nov 2024 23:20:11
Think you’ll find we had less friendly breaks before this completion was introduced.
11.) 17 Nov 2024 21:20:08
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one 47.The competitive nature of the competition has brought several more players into the England fold which farcical friendlies are most unlikely to do.Meaningless in your opinion but not everyone's.
17 Jun 2025 16:39:48
Just announced on Sky Sports £19.6m with £1.7mpotential add-ons
09 Jun 2025 21:09:22
So let’s assume the fee is £36m. E&S confirm it was Wolves who paid the £9.5m to cancel the sell on clause. This means we get less than Sunderland get for Bellingham who’s never played in the Prem! Any thoughts Wandering?
21 Apr 2025 20:13:30
Thanks
12 Dec 2024 20:12:49
Local man certainly but never seen anything saying he’s a Wolves fan infact I think he turned us down in the past. Tell you what, why not get Terry Connor back!?
12 Dec 2024 09:49:39
Well Wandering if its true that these managers have turned us down and not just fake news that’s doing the rounds let’s hope Gary doesn’t decide he’s had enough and quits because we really would be up rubbish creek without a paddle!
Cast your mind back a few years when they tried to replace Mick and no one wanted it.
14 Jun 2025 10:21:32
Apologies Arddunby it took me a day but I get it ?
13 Jun 2025 22:50:29
Nasty? As you say Cashinblack just a bit of fun. ??
12 Jun 2025 17:39:06
Yes Casinblack ?
08 Jun 2025 21:58:36
Noticed a previous comment from Wandering Star that City paid the £9.5m whereas Molineux News states it was Wolves. So which is correct?
08 Jun 2025 19:38:26
According to reports the £36m will be less £9.5m Wolves have paid to remove the sell on clause.