05 Dec 2015 15:41:09
I only posted what was told to me . I broke the reuben Brothers story on here . There is now a 20+page thread in another site where some posters who rea regularly right with inside news confirm they are hearing same names . James stunt was told to me . I was told his love of gold as he owns a gold refining buisness and we are a well known English club who plays in gold . His plans are to sponser our shirts with big deals from his business having a real gold kit not a near hull orange . Finish the ground rebuild to a better spec an size.

1.) 05 Dec 2015
05 Dec 2015 18:19:27
Thanks for the info Ian. I was hearing similar from my source and I know of the Glen Hughes / American bid. Is James Stunt involved with that or is it a spectate bid?
Don't listen to the loaners mate, where else would we post the info we receive than a 'rumour' site?
A few of us cannot say where we get our info from or we wouldn't get any info from then on. I'm sure there are sad people who completely make stuff up but you can tell when some stories on the right track. Appreciate you sharing and I hope to hear from my source over the weekend. He laughed his star off at the Moxey interview with E and S this week.

2.) 06 Dec 2015
05 Dec 2015 23:43:56
So does anyone actually know who is the serious potential handfull of buyers are?

3.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 08:00:29
Oh dear, here we go again. Please everyone. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS JAMES STUNT LOVES GOLD SO HE WANTS TO BUY THE WOLVES GARBAGE. This is the truth, NO ONE knows of any links with any interested parties. This is simply because of privacy contracts that are signed between Wolves and interested parties to ensure that details of both parties are not made public at an early stage. That's just how business works when there vast sums of money involved. We know there are interested parties, but NO ONE, I repeat NO ONE knows who these parties are apart from Morgan and the clubs solicitors. FACT.

4.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 08:54:13
Totally agree Awj2001 however I have seen Mr Stunt's newly created coat of arms from a link on another Wolves rumour site and it clearly states and indeed shows 3 Wolves heads! Coincidence or what? I don't think I'm alowed to post a link or I would.

5.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 09:33:50
'off the site' Stunt enjoys a touch of theatre. Take, for example, those gold bars he donated to the charity gala. They were marked Stunt and Co – the name of his recently created gold refining company
They carried what looks like a heraldic family crest, sporting a knight's helmet and shield with a chevron and three wolves' heads. But the coat of arms would appear to be something of, well, a stunt.

6.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 11:36:21
Tom go read elsewhere if you want "facts" you seem be forgetting this is a rumour site . Discounting any rumour but wish us to take what you say as gospel you are a tit.

7.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 13:42:07
NTG, you are correct in that the 'Stunt and Co', heraldic crest does have three wolves' heads. The one I saw also had 1982 in Roman numerals. Have you seen amore recent update?

8.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 13:57:26
the reason for the 1982 is that's the year that james stunt was born
non disclosure contracts have been signed in my honest opinion the next chairman of wolves will be jez moxey it will be his concortium that morgan choses the spin will be jez knows the club.

9.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 14:09:02
Tom I appreciate your point of view and confidentiality agreements do ensure privacy. However, this is to stop the media predominantly and will never stop interested parties talking to friends/colleagues about things. This is how info gets out and also how the bookies make money by being on step ahead of the general public.
I KNOW of the talks with Morgan and the consortium from America but not how far advanced it is. There is more money backing it than we have seen previously and they are serious!
Believe me or not Tom Twit but this is a rumour site. Why don't you open your own site called Tom Twits Fact site. I'm sure Rafa Benitez will be on it with you.

10.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 14:13:13
No more news/speculation at present but really would not bet against Stunt taking over.

11.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 14:37:57
Thanks Bern4rdwolf.

12.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 15:07:59
Moxey is a master of spin. How many times has he made promises of big signings such as the promise to "spend whatever it takes" to replace Bakary Sako? How many times have we been promised big investment in new signings just about at the time when fans are considering buying or renewing their season tickets? IMHO such announcements were merely made to sell more season tickets because close season after close season we have seen minimal investment. It is my view that he has mentioned that he might be involved in a consortium in order to get this idea out and into the minds of Wolves supporters. In the weeks to come, this will be "mentioned" more and more so that by the time the news finally comes out that the club has been sold to a consortium with him as either Chairman or CEO, it will be no surprise at all. I honestly do NOT believe Moxey has any intention of being edged out at the club but instead will do all he can to consolidate his position and increase his power at Molineux. Raising the £30 million or so to purchase the club would be no problem at all for someone with his contacts but the question is, IF he achieves this, what happens afterwards? Worrying times indeed for all who love the Wolves.

13.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 15:28:59
Indeed this is a rumour site. And of course we all love a good rumour. But what is the point of Ian Martin just making up rubbish and fabrication just to humour himself. And as for Tommo 1970 calling me Tom Twit, I am a little more mature and sensible than to get involved in mud slinging.

14.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 17:23:03
Tom it's what my source is telling me if you'd rather not read it don't .

15.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 17:54:13
Is this guy a cunning Stunt?

16.) 06 Dec 2015
06 Dec 2015 20:40:05
My source is telling me, that there is someone who is going on wolves rumour sites, creating rumours that are false and have no credibility what so ever. He also told me Kevin Costner could be interested in investing in the club. Ya know WOLVES! Dance's with WOLVES! Coincidence? I don't think so!

17.) 07 Dec 2015
07 Dec 2015 07:35:50
I understand people on here getting wound up over the sale. This is really important to us all and we know that in the past false stuff has been added just to make mischief. But I am happy to go along with any of these rumours out of interest without getting convinced. Not because I disbelieve people but because I know that for every one hundred offers made to buy a business one ends up with a sale. Keep the rumours coming folks, it's just a shame we will never know the full story of what's happening just like we never knew if Bruce turned down the manager's job or did Morgan pull the offer.

18.) 07 Dec 2015
07 Dec 2015 12:13:12
Morgan pulled the offer 100 per cent.

19.) 07 Dec 2015
07 Dec 2015 13:39:00
I would like to Apologise to Tom Tit for the very silly name calling. You are entitled to your opinion Tom and post whatever you like, as we all do. At the end of the day we are all Gold and black and we should leave that kind of stuff for Sandwell Town. Sorry.

20.) 08 Dec 2015
08 Dec 2015 07:36:30
Hi Tommo. There is no need to apologise. As someone has already posted on here, the sale of the club is a very emotive issue and is stirring a lot of us into dreams of multi million pound investments and the promise of better times. As you quite rightly say, this is a rumour site and at the end of the day rumours is all that we have to go on at the moment. Whilst we are on the subject, I feel that I should apologise to Ian Martin, I was too quick to rubbish his posts and like the rest of us, he is just posting snippets that he is picking up. Apologies Ian. I look forward to reading more of posts.
I have not heard any news out of Molineux lately, nothing at all, although it was pointed out to me that maybe this is a sign that something is happening. The big statement from Moxey last Thurs came the day after a board meeting, so was obviously a planned statement agreed by the clubs Directors at there meeting, aimed at keeping us supporters on the edge of our seats. One thing that I do agree with in Moxey statement (if I understood it correctly) is that we are looking for a wealthy owner with individual wealth. I do worry slightly about consortiums where there are lots of different investors. Too much scope there for fall out and confusion at board room level. I would really prefer just an 'owner'. But that's just a personal opinion.