Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Wolves Rumours Member Posts
Bail's Profile
Correct Score Competition:
Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:
Not played Flat Out Racing
Not played Flat Out Racing
No Profile Picture uploaded
Team: Where from: Favourite player: Best team moment: Interests: Timezone: |
Bail's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Bail's Posts
To Bail's last 5 rumours posts
To Bail's last 5 rumour replies
Bail's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Bail's rumours posts
10 Oct 2013 23:02:10
Liam McAlinden has gone on loan to Shrewsbury. Don't know how long for.
1.) Would rather it had been Cassidy. He looks lazy and uninterested. How he got double figures for Tranmere I don't know. Liam has got a spark, and looks lively whenever I've seen him. Good luck to him.
2.) Initially for a month, i'd rather it be Cassidy too.
R Truth
3.) 3 months total i'm led to believe to we can recall him after 28 days if need be though
Jay
4.) Shrewsbury have been trying to get him for ages, Graham Tuner knows a player when he see's one, it's a great deal for them Liam is a top striker with loads of f the ball quality's, if he doesn't get to many goals you can bet his assists ill be up there. Good luck Macca.
5.) Probably at the moment would prefer McAllinden to go on loan and improve. He looks talented, so far Cassidy has shown nothing- he is only young and not trying to be to hard but McAllinden looks the better talent. Cassidy can then remain and be 4th choice.
6.) We'll have Cassidy as well if you like, and griffiths----- turner would certainly improve him
7.) Scored 5 minutes into his debut
Jay
8.) I think McAllinden should of been given more first team action so we could see if he's got it, but Cassidy IMO hasn't got it, he's a mid table 1st division player at best. Paul Tamworth
9.) For once Paul Tamworth I agree with you.
R Truth
10.) How far have you lot come down, being experienced in what is and what isn't an average Division 3 player? Oh how the mighty have fallen? Lol
11.) They've fallen a lot the wolves have-------we've also now got there best striker on loan, and turner will make him an even better player, and then sign him up full time
12.) Don't be daft - you are loaning him, he will be a wolves player for a long time. But he does need a right foot as well.
13.) McAlinden will be our best striker one day. For now, enjoy him while he's there.
14.) You enjoy Sako while he's still there, and be very wary of Coventry on satday, away win that
Bail's banter posts with other poster's replies to Bail's banter posts
11 Oct 2013 22:04:47
Found out it is for 3 months
31 Aug 2013 14:36:57
No Sako in the squad for Port Vale, reason 'KJ has said that the player is aware of the interest in him and is not in the right frame of mind to play however the club not accepted a bid and not close at this stage. If the window passes and Sako stays he will be fully committed to cause'
Anyone else thinks Bullsh*t?
1.) Head gone!. same agent as Fletcher?
They think we are all as thick as those fans of many trees who can only aspire to be planks.
2.) Is that a cryptic clue?
I doubt this very much.
Macca is a bright lad, my son went to school with him, and I am pretty sure that if there was any interest it would be private and confidential.
There is no way he would be broadcasting leaving the club he supports to anybody, mates or otherwise.
I see no problem with playing him. We have made our point that we can compete without him and when no other clubs came in for him I honestly think it has put him in his place.
We are paying his wages, so, as long as he can add something to the team and I doubt very much he will be a disruptive influence, play him.
You never know, at the end of the season he may have gone from villian to hero. I for one hpoe so.
Under Solbakken we were on the decline. He was trying to get us to play a certain style of football that was not suitable for the team. We didn't look like scoring, never mind winning a game. I honestly couldn't see where points were going to come from. At one stage I think we were 3rd in the league, but were still playing awful. Creating very little.
I think it was right for him to go if they had an experienced manager, who had got a plan in place to take over.
I didn't agree with the appointment of Saunders, talked a good game but too inexperienced.