Wolves Banter Archive May 07 2016

07 May 2016 21:22:20
Who is Bob Laslett?! I've never heard of this guy?

08 May 2016 16:15:45
Well if you bother to read what was above you would know wouldn't you.

07 May 2016 18:15:12
Can you all get over this money shop stuff it's getting boring it's just a name on our shirts and I bet most of you whose wingin have had a loan from them.

07 May 2016 19:27:16
How much are you willing to gamble, that most individuals making constructive comments regarding this issue, haven't had a loan from them?

07 May 2016 08:15:20
Read the blog of guy who did petition against new club sponsor " the money shop" he handed in over 13000 signatures that didn't want them as main sponsor and while club aknowledged it they basically not going change anything - claimed decision to have tms wasn't just about money yet when asked if deal was around £300-400,000 pr season club wouldn't comment - from the guys blog u get opinion that when he had meeting with jez etc all club care about is corporate folk it's almost like the paying fans are a inconviniance that they " have to tolerate" the said more action will be taken to show we don't want tms as main sponsor and idea of alternative shirt being made was option - when asked if club would consider official shirt for adults with choice of with / without sponsor was told only kids get no sponsor and this was clubs decision as it not actually law that kids don't have tms on shirts unlike if sponsor was betting firm so basically as fans we just a cash cow for them and we don't have opinion that counts.

07 May 2016 09:13:42
Yousound a little surprised yamyam, the stuff that came out from last Fan Parliament made it clea also. I am referring to the attitude in the responses and that stupid project they paid for its on a Wolves blog, from a guy who attended.

07 May 2016 09:59:44
When started supporting wolves was a club that actually cared what fans said did everything could get as many fans in ground week in week out even if team wasn't much good at time the fans mattered now we just a means to an end so long as they get 10,000 st holders every yr they ain't bothered about fans and now corporate are what matters well when they only ones at games cause normal fans had enough we see how much they had tolerate us then - my club I love is being ripped apart by money obsessed ejits who have no sence of what this club means to the fans and local community.

07 May 2016 10:00:24
As with Moxey's wife having the catering contract, the guy who spoke at the fans Parliament was a good friend of Moxey. He did very well out of the paid for survey and talked quite a lot of bollards from what I read.

We are but turds on their shoes, how to hit them.

Don't by the cheap foriegn made shirt with MS on it or any other overpriced crap out of the shops.

07 May 2016 10:31:31
Yamyamrob.
This doesn't surprise me in the least. To modern-day corporate Wolves, the fans are just the "little people" to be exploited. Disgusting I know.

07 May 2016 10:47:42
I def won't be buying new shirt or anything with tms crap on it if u get chance read petition guys blog u read how evasive they were to him don't get why when got banks beer and jag just down rd why never tried do a deal.

07 May 2016 14:58:00
Don't you all think it's time to move on from the money shop furore. It is here to stay and all the moaning and petitions isn't going to change it. They have paid what moxey demanded and it's not going to change now. If you don't like it don't buy the shirt.

07 May 2016 15:05:10
Apparently Moxey tried to say The Moneyshop wasn't just because of most money, but because they have an existing relationship with us for last 7 years from sponsoring stand, and the sponsorship is about developing a strategic partnership. I'd guess, as per that idiot Ryan McKnight, with Wolverhampton City and district social projects. It's a complete load of b$ll$$ks.

For a start, Moneyshop head office is Nottingham, they sponsor a stand at Notts Forest (as we saw last week) . So the idea Moneyshop have a special relationship with us or would have any reason to, is bull$$$$. The stuff about the social projects is also crap, it's standard American franchising of towns, where a Company leeches off it and gives back a small amount for good PR. WWFC think they're going to share in the good PR from a few tatty charity projects, without getting the bad press for facilitating Moneyshop leeching off the poorest and creating / contributing to / compounding those problems in the first place.

This sponsorship is going to seriously harm Wolves, it will class define and class limit us, cause Wolves to be over-urban and local only, less inclusive, devoid of glamour, and have much less reach and potential in terms of support. And it will harm Wolverhampton, as it will brand it to others as a desperate pay-day loan society (like Wonga did Blackpool) and make other investment less likely, will harm Wolves regeneration.

Also - Moneyshop never sponsored the SJH stand, it wasn't called that until May 2015 after he'd passed away. I don't believe SJH would have wanted his name directly associating with a Company like that, either on his stand or Wolves shirt. It completely conflicts with his legacy, which was £70m spent to retain Wolves dignity. With Moneyshop, Moxey (and Morgan for allowing it) are trashing Wolves dignity and class, are betraying SJH and destroying his legacy. For all the £70m of his money, with Moneyshop we've no dignity left at all.

07 May 2016 15:25:50
But what did we achieve with Jack's legacy? Nothing. We need to move on from this it's not going to be changed. If people want to use the money shop that is up to them. People have a choice who to borrow money off and there is worse than the money shop. Come the start of the new season all of this will be forgotten especially if we can start with a few wins.

07 May 2016 15:41:08
That's exactly how if I had the skills would put it ulf seems that some folk on here more than happy have tms crap all over ground promoting their debt agency I for one and pretty sure fair few others as well will not be spending my £ on club merchandise with tms on it they got nothing do with Wolverhampton just piggy back off name wouldn't be prob if they were honest realise they exist cause they a need but don't agree with how they suck those who need their services dry with excessive Apr rates.

07 May 2016 15:59:56
So if the people behind the money shop buy the club as some on here thinks, will you all still be throwing your toys out the pram? Will you be refusing to attend games because of the business our owners would be in? I think not. All financial institutions prey on the general public. Just look at Lloyd's and RBS.

They have fleeced the general public for billions with the help of our government. Would we be happy with there name on our shirt. The plain truth of it is that with the state of today's game those who pay the most will always prevail.

{Ed033's Note - i think this post belongs on our talk conspiracy site.

07 May 2016 17:16:17
Moxey said it wasn't about how much got paid end day we mean jack s**t to club cause if u can't even take notice of over half your average gates opinion just shows how detached clubs higher archy become from the fans I think most folk just totally fed up with all cloak n dagger stuff and ount bs and broken promises get fed every yr - be honest do any us have trust that if got to prem club would try keep us there rather than take money and try do prem on cheap.