01 Jun 2014 21:59:46
From what I can gather from speaking to a few sources this week, I don't think Wolves are in a hurry to complete any signings, and it will be a case of "quality over quantity" this summer. If the right deal for the right player is an option, then of course they'll be interested, but a lot of signings this time of the year are signings for signings sake, made by clubs who have had a bad season and trying to draw a line under it, or by clubs who will/have released a lot of players, so the replenishing of players needs to start quickly.
Local press say that crawley want clarke on a season loan, Swansea wolffffffffffff
02 Jun 2014 13:41:13
Opportunistic by Crawley, but I don't think he'll get games at Wolves and a deal could be attractive to all parties.
But you would wonder what the value in that move would be? Crawley? Not exactly awash with £s. Surely better options exist.
At the time when we got him, it seemed like Clarke was a good covering option with Doyle, Griffiths, etc going. But following the Gillingham "result" we hit the afterburners and Clarke, coupled with a few injuries (v Arsenal even before we bought him) didn't really get a look in.
Sako, Dicko, Henry and Jacobs scored 40 goals between them, throw in Edwards and it's closer to 50. Bit of a head scratcher for KJ - does Clarke fit this system? If not and we can get better then let's do it. But does a loan (to Crawley, or indeed anyone, apart from Sheff U) really make sense at this time? wolfshead.
Crawley are actually rich for league 1
WILKO
If they're so rich why don't they fix the beach they play on?
Maybe mega-rich now that they've left half their squad go, but £750k-rich for one player? We can and should be doing better for club and player. Tricky one nonetheless, WILKO. Of all the signings which KJ made that was the one to bring the sceptics out the most. wolfshead.