11 May 2016 16:49:32
Well that's the new kit then, shame the junior option isn't available in adult sizes, the junior one would look betterr if the stripes were all continuous but is that a Moxey payback, the 13000 signatures have been ignored, like the shirt but will not be buying one, how many others will boycott it too. MOXEY OUT NOW. He is ruining our club.


1.) 11 May 2016
11 May 2016 19:41:29
I like it. Will be buying. Couldn't care less who's on the front as long as we get some money from them. Don't see why everyone is crying over it.


2.) 11 May 2016
11 May 2016 20:52:13
completely agree with above post.
the sponsor represents the club officials like moxey rather than the fans and the club's performance.
could say the same about the doritos sponsorship promoting unhealthy eating but no one moaned then ey.


3.) 11 May 2016
11 May 2016 21:19:41
'Don't see why everyone is crying over it'

What a sweeping generalisation that statement is!

Personally, I won't be purchasing a shirt sponsored by that particular company.

However, its all about your believes and principles at the end of the day!

Each to their own.


4.) 11 May 2016
11 May 2016 22:05:00
Didn't mean to offend Chasetown, I didn't understand why a proportion of people were so bothered by it, as Ulf has given me a detailed explanation, I do know understand some fans annoyance to the Money Shop

To me. It's still just a source or revenue, no one even notices shirt sponsors anymore. For instance no one says anything about Leeds not even having one, or hulls Flamingo Land! One team even had Pornhub!


5.) 11 May 2016
11 May 2016 22:49:39
Hembico, no offence taken; the sponsorship deal is a serious issue with over 13000 individuals signing an on-line petition against the deal.

These individuals had obviously taken notice of the sponsorship deal! There is a principle involved here and the hierarchy at the club need to take into consideration the views and wishes of all supporters.

Something which I feel is sadly lacking at present!


6.) 12 May 2016
12 May 2016 06:59:09
Club had chance compromise but instead said if adult and want shirt have to have sponsor having had 24hrs to adjust will admitt it is decent but tms on front has ruined it a plain no sponsor option would look v smart and could been best selling shirt to date but what fans care about not matter so no purchase from me afraid.


7.) 12 May 2016
12 May 2016 09:47:39
hembico, I think it's like this:

Everyone here follows Wolves, and for many it's more than that, we're part of the journey too both in terms of how much we're paying and how our moods are affected etc.

We follow Wolves because, well, who knows. But we don't have any emotional association with Money Shop and probably no positive financial one either, unless we own shares in them (unlikely) . So why would we want to wear a Money Shop shirt? If we think of it as a Money Shop shirt with Wolves livery rather than the other way round we probably wouldn't go near it. Money Shop shirts are for Money Shop reps at exhibition stands. I don't identify with that at all.

The shirt connects us both to Wolves and Money Shop. You buy the shirt, you get both.

Maybe there's a niche market in "upgrade kits" to be made, iron-on patches to hide the Money Shop logo?